I suspect that the vast majority of the EAA members who are going to use SW will do so for a few one-time personal projects, and they almost certainly won't need all the "automation" that comes with the Toolbox (SW or private) "smart" fasteners.Ģ. Selecting the part from ordered lists can be just as simple, and also has better control over custom properties of each part, if SKU numbers are used.ġ. Furthermore in brief, some users have had bad experiences with Toolbox parts over the years between different releases, and have decided instead to keep their own instead for long term stability. The only thing I find useful in the toolbox over parts which I've made myself as above is the automatic sizing of fasteners to the hole or bolt being placed upon. The Toolbox parts, specifically, will not load properly even if given to you because the add-in is not loaded. With the part saved to your Design Library in a "Fastener" or "Hardware" or other sorted directory, you can define SmartMates as a Reference Geometry Feature so that it seats into a hole (bolt, rivet, etc) or onto a bolt and seated to a surface (nuts) or what works for you in your workflow.
Edit: Step files import as a part without features, but imported bodies instead. I import STEP files by dragging the file into a window of Solidworks that has no files already open. (If you get one), The STEP isn't by default an associated file type. Edit: Most parts from McM are actual parts with feature tree intact, whereas I was confused with other vendors' downloaded files that I deal with more often.
Solidworks toolbox license download#
It's not that hard unless you intend to use every part imaginable, particularly if you know what you need.Ī great place to download STEP files of common hardware from is Their models are clean and reliable in my experience, requiring no Import Diagnostics to fix them up. The language is not entirely clear, as it's Marketing (**sparkles**). This page () shows what is included in various levels of license. EAA/Student Version comes with the functionality of Solidworks Standard as I understand it. We offer a ton of classes in Creo and SolidWorks, as well as Rhino, Alias and more! So no matter your design needs, contact Design Engine to help.No. No matter what CAD program you choose for your next project, we are always available for help. But, if you want to design more simpler objects, you might want to look into using SolidWorks for your next project. If you wish to design something extremely complex, Creo is definitely the choice for you. Overall, choosing between Creo and SolidWorks for your next project comes down to one main factor: the complexity of the project. This makes SolidWorks a much more attractive option to those customers. For designing simpler projects, there is no need to go through the hassle of learning all of these advanced methods and techniques in Creo. SolidWorks is becoming more widely used in the industry due to its easy nature. SolidWorks does not have the capabilities to work with large assemblies or design high-quality surfaces. SolidWorks will be able to solve your problem within limits. SolidWorks is primarily used for smaller scale and simpler design projects. Creo would also be a better choice for any project consisting of large assemblies.
Creo is much more stable and far superior to SolidWorks when it comes to top-down design and surfacing. There are benefits to both and there is no right or wrong answer to which you should use for your next project, but if your project consists of ‘top-down’ design at an automotive company, for example, you will most definitely want to use Creo.
Now that you know what Creo and SolidWorks are and how they compare to one another, you might be wondering, “ Which should I choose for my next project? ”.
Solidworks toolbox license full#
Some people believe that the fact that Creo is more advanced is a disadvantage to the platform, saying that Creo is full of all of these tools and capabilities that they have no need for. However, SolidWorks does lack some of the capabilities that Creo offers to users. If you are looking to pursue a career in industrial design or something similar, SolidWorks would be the easiest option to find a job. Because SolidWorks has a much more user-friendly interface, it is used in businesses of all sizes across the world. Creo is a much more complex program and is aimed at the higher-end CAD market. SolidWorks is a much less complex option and has a quicker learning curve for beginners. The biggest difference between Creo and SolidWorks would be their complexity for users. This helped SolidWorks to initially infiltrate the CAD market, but as of today both Creo and SolidWorks are much closer in price. When SolidWorks was first released, it claimed that it could do 80% of what Creo could do at a fraction of the price.